The US. The Supreme Court issued an injunction late Wednesday preventing the governor of New York from enforcing the employment restrictions on religious establishments for 10 and 25 people, and granted a motion from the Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and Agudath Israel

The state had advised the court that there was no need for action as the restrictions attempting to prevent the spread of the coronavirus were recently voted back

The court apparently split 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Judges Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan disagreeing

In an unsigned majority opinion, the court said the restrictions violate religious freedom and are not neutral because they “single out places of worship for particularly harsh treatment”

While religious institutions were concerned, companies found essential could take in as many people as they wanted, the court said, and the list of those companies included acupuncture facilities and others the court found non-essential

The court said there is no evidence that the organizations filing the lawsuit contributed to the spread of Covid-19

In his dissent, Roberts said he saw no need to take these measures because the state has revised the names of the affected areas and none of the places of worship seeking relief are now numerically restricted and able to hold services up to 50 Percent capacity

Breyer said if the state wants to reinstate the borders, plaintiffs can return to court. Sotomayor and Kagan said the injunction “will only worsen the suffering of the nation.”

Both Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh agreed. Neither Amy Coney Barrett nor Samuel Alito submitted separate comments

“The Supreme Court’s decision on the religious assemblies illustrates the Supreme Court more than anything. This was really just an opportunity for the court to express its philosophy and policies. It has no practical implications,” he said / p>

Repeating Roberts’ dissent, Cuomo said the entire case was contentious as the Brooklyn zone restrictions no longer exist. He said the case was now being referred back to a lower court

“The decision is not final. Second, it did not affect our rules for collecting masses. So these were not mentioned. The general limits were not mentioned,” said Cuomo, who questioned why the court “questioned a contentious issue Topic “has decided

President Donald Trump responded Thursday morning with a comment on a tweet on a Supreme Court prosecution site regarding the “Happy Thanksgiving” ruling, he wrote

Pete Williams is an NBC News correspondent covering the Department of Justice and the Supreme Court in Washington

Supreme Court

World News – USA – Supreme Court prevents NY from enforcing Covid limits on churches